ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZAAABACADAE
1
TimestampHow did the course meet your learning objectives?Comments and suggestionsHow was the duration of the course?Comments and suggestionsHow useful were the training materials?Comments and suggestionsHow knowledgeable was the instructor?Comments and suggestionsHow much value did the instructor add to lecture materials?Suggestions and commentsHow useful were the practical demos?Comments and suggestionsWas enough time dedicated to practical demos?Comments and suggestionsHow well was the course organized (program, registration, schedule...)?Comments and suggestionsHow much did you learn?Comments and suggestionsHow useful should this course be in your daily job?Comments and suggestionsWhat part(s) of the course did you like most?What part(s) of the course did you like least?Overall ratingComments and suggestionsFurther training needs?CommentsWhat reasons prompted you to choose Bootlin?How did you first learn about Bootlin?Interested in other types of embedded Linux engineering services?Comments and expectations
2
7/23/2021 18:03:38444544444495Availability of online sessions, Trainer, Open training materials that can be checked in advance, LanguageInternet search enginesLinux board support package development, Boot time reduction, Power management, Development of real-time systems, Build environment support, Root filesystem development, Technical support, Bug fixing, Technology and architecture consulting
3
7/23/2021 19:04:594Some observations on how to integrate all of this in a yocto project would have been very interesting for me. 24553It was a bit hard to follow when you rapidly showed us your pieces of code. Maybe schematics that summarized all the calls would be easier to follow3553I don't often face graphics on my daily job but next time I do I will be more at easeThe part about dmabuf was very interested, I wish we had a bit more time to talk about itThe part about every type of screen was a bit long to me105I did not find another formation on this subjectTechnical resources on the Bootlin websiteNot interestedVery good session, thank you
4
7/23/2021 22:34:085244534543105Not applicable - My management made the decisionBootlin chosen by my managementNot interested
5
8/31/2021 15:41:095I particularly appreciated the training format. Having only 4hours a day make it possible to do the daily job before and then to fully concentrate on the training.34I wished there were more diagrams. But I am a very visual person.554I wished the frequency analysis part was more detailed.4It was well organized. The only problem was the access to google doc, which access was not allowed for the participants from our company54The part about the Linux stack itself (KMS, DRM).The theory part. I knew most of it already and it think it was too fast for someone with a little graphic experience (for example the Fourrier transformation).
It is a good starting point though and the attendee can later have a look at the training slides and at the source code of Paul.
10One of the best training I ever attended!3Another team was already trained by bootlin and they recommended us the training.Due to your contributions to the Open Source...Not interestedGood question. I can't answer for my compapny here.
6
8/31/2021 15:46:4652There were a few slides, mostly at the end of some days, that could have gotten a bit more time. Overall though, good pace, well done, so it's more like a 2.5.
4There were some minor flaws in some slides that could lead to misunderstandings. We gave the trainer some feedback in this regard. Overall, a well-prepared slide-deck including demo code.4The trainer showed that he is knowledgeable in the topics and could answer several questions in-depth, so this is a 4.5. "more than enough" is difficult to achieve though, especially considering the larger scope of the training. Probably rephrase.533I am not sure why there was a suggestion to register for the Matrix channel (via an 8 page instruction manual). I did skip this step and could perfectly communicate and chat with the trainer during the sessions. Some colleagues registered and did not use the feature once. So this seems superfluous.5This is a strong 3.5. While working with the lower-level Linux graphics stack is not the general use case, the training provided very beneficial insights that facilitate delving into these topics on demand and understanding what happens "behind the scenes".3display engine, mode setting, DRM, DRM prime, compositors, Mesa stack, interaction between applications and compositorssome parts like graphics fundamentals and OpenGL were not as beneficial to me due to personal experience. still, good content that for sure helped some of my colleagues
105the outline of the training contentvia colleagues pretty much all of these topics are of relevance on a company level
7
8/31/2021 15:49:22534552554Section about Base Theory and Concepts about Graphics since
Nothing94Availability of online sessions, Open training materials that can be checked in advanceCourse recommended by previous participantsNot interested