A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | AA | AB | AC | AD | AE | AF | AG | AH | AI | AJ | AK | AL | AM | AN | AO | AP | AQ | AR | AS | AT | AU | AV | AW | AX | AY | AZ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Timestamp | How did the course meet your learning objectives? | How was the duration of the course? | Comments and suggestions | Comments and suggestions | How useful were the training materials? | Comments and suggestions | Will you recommend this document to others? | Comments and suggestions | If you have Linux / Android project opportunities, will you use this document again in the future? | Comments and suggestions | How important are printed materials? | Comments and suggestions | Did instructor oral explanations add value to the lecture materials? | Comments | How much value did the instructor add to lecture materials? | Suggestions and comments | Was the instructor helpful with practical labs? | Comments and suggestions | How do you rate the training equipment (mainly computers)? | Comments and suggestions | How well was the course organized (program, registration, schedule...)? | Comments and suggestions | How much did you learn? | Comments and suggestions | How useful should this course be in your daily job? | Comments and suggestions | Would you recommend this course to others? | Comments and suggestions | Overall rating | Comments and suggestions | Further training needs? | Comments | How did the course meet your learning objectives? | What part(s) of the course did you like most? | Comments | What part(s) of the course did you like least? | What reasons prompted you to choose Bootlin? | How did you first learn about Bootlin? | Interested in other types of embedded Linux engineering services? | Comments and expectations | Comments and suggestions | How do you rate training conditions (room size, equipment, environment)? | How useful were the practical demos? | Comments and suggestions | Comments and suggestions | How difficult were the training labs? | Was enough time dedicated to practical demos? | Comments and suggestions | How knowledgeable was the instructor? | Please tell us why you need or don't need paper printed materials | How far do you come from? |
2 | 4/9/2021 17:56:23 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 9 | 5 | 5 | Availability of online sessions, Trainer, Open training materials that can be checked in advance, Cost | Presentations in conferences | Technology and architecture consulting | 5 | 2 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 4/9/2021 18:00:30 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 10 | This is a very unique course. I especially appreciate the starting point from raw pixel operations independent of any particular technology. This was the right starting point for me. I enjoyed understanding the connection from fbdev to modern DRM. The wayland topics were very interesting. I got a bit overwhelmed at the very end about OpenGL but I understand this topic would really need an entire course to go into fully. Thank you very much! | 5 | 5 | Availability of online sessions, Open training materials that can be checked in advance, Language, Cost | Internet search engines | Not interested | 5 | 3 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 4/9/2021 18:01:44 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 4 | 4 | Availability of online sessions, Open training materials that can be checked in advance | Technical resources on the Bootlin website | Not interested | 2 | 2 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5 | 4/9/2021 18:01:46 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 8 | 3 | 5 | Availability of online sessions | Course recommended by previous participants | Not interested | 5 | 3 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 4/9/2021 18:06:10 | 3 | May be on separate course example with graphical driver. | May be some more time for practical sessions. | 5 | Very well organized. | Very knowledgeable. | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 5 | Training in writing simple or complex video driver. | 5 | Every part was perfect. | You offer on of the best products on the market. | Internet search engines | Not interested | Some real driver implementation from scratch. | 4 | More time for practical demos. | 2 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | 4/9/2021 18:19:47 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | It was hard to stay focused listening for 4 hours. Breaks were welcome ! I assume that they were welcome for Paul too ;) | 5 | 4 | I was completely new to this subject. By the end of the course I still feel that I am not completely mastering the topic. I have a better understanding of the overall system, but I think it will be difficult to really deep into one subject. I hope the linked documentation will help | 8 | 4 | 4 | Image and color representation, original and really interesting to better understand the rest of the training | Looking at the source code for demos on "Pixel Drawing" was really too long... | Not applicable - My management made the decision | Bootlin chosen by my management | Not interested | 3 | too bad that we only could look at the demos without beeing able to do them in our machine. Maybe some setup to ease exercise on our side to better understand how everything works (even out of training time) could help us practice | 3 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8 | 4/9/2021 18:21:35 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 9 | 5 | It would be great having a course covering all media stuff(VPU encoding/decoding). | 5 | The initial basics and the in-depth about acceleration and how it interacts with WMs. | Can't really find one. I mean, there are parts less interesting for me than the one I've like the most but no part I can say I like least. | Availability of online sessions, Trainer, Open training materials that can be checked in advance | Bootlin is spread all around in open-source world so I've got in touch there and then found you have these courses. Most of all while contributing to Buildroot I've seen the setting Thomas Petazzoni has while explaining me things, so I've thought that Bootlin in general follows that way, and I've found it the same in Paul | Not interested | 4 | 4 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9 | 4/9/2021 18:33:48 | 2 | I feel some content was rushed through. Maybe the duration was adequate but the content could have been better organized. | At work, we have this demo which uses gtk for rendering, and is very slow. Now I feel prepared to tackle the problem upon solid foundations. | 5 | The 200 slide presentation contain lots of details and references to other material. | Paul demonstrated complete expertise on the area and humbleness to investigate when he was not sure. He is also very friendly and attentive to all attendees. | 5 | Given his past experience, Paul was able to complement the material with examples and details. | 4 | Overall all good! I feel content could be reshuffled a bit to take into account attendees get distracted along the class. Bring the important stuff first, and push demos to the end. | 5 | Linux graphical stack is complicated, and all areas were well covered. | 5 | 9 | I found this course at the very last minute, was intrigued by the proposition and material, and after its ending it was all a pleasant surprise! | 2 | 5 | Theory was well contrasted with practical use cases, I like it! I also am of the opinion that the values shared were correct for all the enthusiasts of the open source world, like big emphasis on Wayland or recognizing the work of contributors. | Covering some old material like VGA might have taken far too long in prejudice of fresher and newer content. Hours were difficult for me. | Availability of online sessions, Trainer, Open training materials that can be checked in advance, Language, Cost, emphasis on open source and transparency | HackerNews post of some of the materials. | Linux board support package development, Development of real-time systems, Technology and architecture consulting | 4 | Demos were useful, 3d rendering demos would have been awesome too. Also would have been some code walkthrough of stable components into the stack, like some part of the kernel and maybe mesa. | 2 | Personally demos and labs help me assimilate messages better. | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
10 | 4/9/2021 19:06:22 | 3 | This is already very dense, I think it is well timed and scoped for a week. | The themes were covered very thoroughly and the content was very much in line was the course agenda. I was looking to understand the Linux display stacks better and I did! | 4 | The slides are great, they support the trainer and will certainly be a reference material for my work. Some sections could benefit from illustrations: there are already some architecture graphs that show the links between components, but in some case these links could be explicited to show what information is exchanged, or maybe sequence diagrams. | Paul’s expertise was very pregnant through the whole course, whether on the course material itself or his answers to the questions. | 5 | Even though the slides are very dense with a lot of text, it was all very fluid, with useful comments, references to previous slides, etc. | 5 | 4 | 5 | 10 | 3 | 5 | Cost, I already knew Bootlin and found this training at a right time | I know Thomas and have seen other Bootlin employees at tech talks | Linux board support package development, Build environment support, Bug fixing, Technology and architecture consulting | 5 | When presenting code, I would suggest using a light background and syntax highlighting, but it was already good. Kudos for the fast transitions between demos, code and slides! | 3 | 5 |