ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZAAABACADAEAFAGAHAIAJAKALAMANAOAPAQARASATAUAVAWAXAYAZ
1
TimestampHow did the course meet your learning objectives?How was the duration of the course?Comments and suggestionsComments and suggestionsHow useful were the training materials?Comments and suggestionsWill you recommend this document to others?Comments and suggestionsIf you have Linux / Android project opportunities, will you use this document again in the future?Comments and suggestionsHow important are printed materials?Comments and suggestionsDid instructor oral explanations add value to the lecture materials?CommentsHow much value did the instructor add to lecture materials?Suggestions and commentsWas the instructor helpful with practical labs?Comments and suggestionsHow do you rate the training equipment (mainly computers)?Comments and suggestionsHow well was the course organized (program, registration, schedule...)?Comments and suggestionsHow much did you learn?Comments and suggestionsHow useful should this course be in your daily job?Comments and suggestionsWould you recommend this course to others?Comments and suggestionsOverall ratingComments and suggestionsFurther training needs?CommentsHow did the course meet your learning objectives?What part(s) of the course did you like most?CommentsWhat part(s) of the course did you like least?What reasons prompted you to choose Bootlin?How did you first learn about Bootlin?Interested in other types of embedded Linux engineering services?Comments and expectationsComments and suggestionsHow do you rate training conditions (room size, equipment, environment)?How useful were the training labs?Comments and suggestionsComments and suggestionsHow difficult were the training labs?Was enough time dedicated to practical labs?Comments and suggestionsHow knowledgeable was the instructor?Please tell us why you need or don't need paper printed materialsHow far do you come from?
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
2/7/2020 14:56:3425555541055Not applicable - My management made the decisionBootlin chosen by my managementLinux board support package development, Build environment support, Root filesystem development, Technical support, Bug fixing5335
10
2/7/2020 15:01:3534little more details would help. the slides sometimes too short45555711the hardware issue are very goodTrainer, Open training materials that can be checked in advanceCourse recommended by previous participantsLinux board support package development5the labs is always based on the old lab. please start the old lab with new code 435
11
2/7/2020 15:02:1135555551055Availability for on-site sessions, Open training materials that can be checked in advance, Language, Access to full feedback from participants to previous sessionsCourse recommended by previous participantsLinux board support package development, Boot time reduction, Power management, Development of real-time systems, Technical support, Bug fixing, Technology and architecture consulting5335
12
2/7/2020 15:10:5134Add a hint about finding kernel APIs from the source tree by running git grep on include/ and arch/arm/ . A couple of times I thought it might be useful if the materials said "don't continue unless you see XYZ result" (can't think of any specifics anymore though).It was nice to have a Real Programmer[tm] do the training :-)45443Not sure yet; I'm not doing any kernel programming in my day job currently.854I liked the labs in the final two days -- the earlier exercises were too easy/boring for me.Not applicable - My management made the decisionPresentations in conferencesLinux board support package development4Finding the problem in debugging/drvbroken.c was way too easy.235
13
2/7/2020 15:12:504235442834TrainerCourse recommended by previous participantsNot interested4435
14
2/7/2020 15:13:1235 days with lot of information and practical lab. For a first introduction to linux driver development it had the right length.I've learned a lot in this course even that I already had a OS course with Linux driver development in my computer science study.5IMHO the material, slides and lab material, has the right amount of information, in combination with the online elixir tool.4It was really good that the instructor had a look on the code after some time of own practice and also explained additional background and things that are good to know.55551045Open training materials that can be checked in advance, Members of my department already had chosen Bootlin / Free-electron in the past and they were very satisfied with the courses.Course recommended by previous participantsLinux board support package development, Power management, Development of real-time systems, Build environment support5IMHO, in combination with the material it had the right difficulty. As I had already knownledge about microcontroller design, its functions and some experience with driver development in the past during my study time, it was not so difficult to understand all the topics and do the training labs. It helps to have an understanding of how the hardware works and experience with firmware development.24In general, the time for the practical labs was right chosen. For me, due to my existing knowledge, I could have done more topics and practical labs in this time. To have optional practical addons was good, but could have been a bit more.5