A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | AA | AB | AC | AD | AE | AF | AG | AH | AI | AJ | AK | AL | AM | AN | AO | AP | AQ | AR | AS | AT | AU | AV | AW | AX | AY | AZ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Timestamp | How did the course meet your learning objectives? | How was the duration of the course? | Comments and suggestions | Comments and suggestions | How useful were the training materials? | Comments and suggestions | Will you recommend this document to others? | Comments and suggestions | If you have Linux / Android project opportunities, will you use this document again in the future? | Comments and suggestions | How important are printed materials? | Comments and suggestions | Did instructor oral explanations add value to the lecture materials? | Comments | How much value did the instructor add to lecture materials? | Suggestions and comments | Was the instructor helpful with practical labs? | Comments and suggestions | How do you rate the training equipment (mainly computers)? | Comments and suggestions | How well was the course organized (program, registration, schedule...)? | Comments and suggestions | How much did you learn? | Comments and suggestions | How useful should this course be in your daily job? | Comments and suggestions | Would you recommend this course to others? | Comments and suggestions | Overall rating | Comments and suggestions | Further training needs? | Comments | How did the course meet your learning objectives? | What part(s) of the course did you like most? | Comments | What part(s) of the course did you like least? | What reasons prompted you to choose Bootlin? | How did you first learn about Bootlin? | Interested in other types of embedded Linux engineering services? | Comments and expectations | Comments and suggestions | How do you rate training conditions (room size, equipment, environment)? | How useful were the training labs? | Comments and suggestions | Comments and suggestions | How difficult were the training labs? | Was enough time dedicated to practical labs? | Comments and suggestions | How knowledgeable was the instructor? | Please tell us why you need or don't need paper printed materials | How far do you come from? |
2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9 | 12/6/2019 17:29:15 | 3 | good enough | for me without extensive C background recent years was hard but helped to get points of the course | 4 | re-reading helped to get some topics | 4 | Indeed | 5 | indeed | 5 | 5 | no comments, just as what the mark shows | 5 | dev world of drivers | 4 | wanted more to see dev part of my work, so valuable | 7 | nice course | 3 | so far no plans | 5 | i2c driver, hard but practical | n/a | Geographical proximity (public sessions only), Availability for on-site sessions, Trainer, Open training materials that can be checked in advance, Language | Internet search engines | Technical support | Nice training, hope to get deeper in C and up to the speed in this area | indeed | 5 | to make a real driver is more than valuable | enough level I think | 4 | 4 | maybe more time frames for labs | 5 | paper materials are good for making notes as "old school" | |||||||||||||||
10 | 12/6/2019 17:45:56 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | Some content has been already known (from past working experience), but the rest was new (the reason for attending the training). | 4 | My current job activity unfortunately is not strictly related to this training's goals, but I really hope to get this changed in the near future. | 7 | 5 | Linux kernel optimizations, in-depth driver development, adding support for new boards. | 5 | Practical activities (labs). | The first part was mostly known to me, but I wouldn't say I didn't like it. | Open training materials that can be checked in advance, Language | Knowing Thomas Petazzoni's contributions to buildroot project. | Boot time reduction, Development of real-time systems | 5 | 3 | 3 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11 | 12/6/2019 17:57:42 | 3 | I would say quite well balanced | If time allows, more info about the internal kernel architecture would be helpful | 5 | 3 | 5 | Really interesting and useful topics arose during the training | 5 | 5 | Everything went perfectly! | 4 | Part of the information was new while for the rest it was a very good opportunity to consolidate | 5 | For sure it will help as it is directly related to my current job | 6 | 4 | 5 | Especially the practical labs and the instructor availability to answer to all the questions | Lack of time to get into more details :) | Availability for on-site sessions, Trainer, Open training materials that can be checked in advance, Access to full feedback from participants to previous sessions, This seems to be the best hands-on training available | Technical resources on the Bootlin website | Linux board support package development, Development of real-time systems, Technology and architecture consulting | 5 | I would have liked to have more labs like the ones included | With a few exceptions, e.g. the device tree part, which was new for me, the labs have medium difficulty | 3 | 5 | There is quite a good balance between practical labs and theory | 5 | Training materials are particularly useful during the training session but they are not a must |