A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | AA | AB | AC | AD | AE | AF | AG | AH | AI | AJ | AK | AL | AM | AN | AO | AP | AQ | AR | AS | AT | AU | AV | AW | AX | AY | AZ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Timestamp | How did the course meet your learning objectives? | How was the duration of the course? | Comments and suggestions | Comments and suggestions | How useful were the training materials? | Comments and suggestions | Will you recommend this document to others? | Comments and suggestions | If you have Linux / Android project opportunities, will you use this document again in the future? | Comments and suggestions | How important are printed materials? | Comments and suggestions | Did instructor oral explanations add value to the lecture materials? | Comments | How much value did the instructor add to lecture materials? | Suggestions and comments | Was the instructor helpful with practical labs? | Comments and suggestions | How do you rate the training equipment (mainly computers)? | Comments and suggestions | How well was the course organized (program, registration, schedule...)? | Comments and suggestions | How much did you learn? | Comments and suggestions | How useful should this course be in your daily job? | Comments and suggestions | Would you recommend this course to others? | Comments and suggestions | Overall rating | Comments and suggestions | Further training needs? | Comments | How did the course meet your learning objectives? | What part(s) of the course did you like most? | Comments | What part(s) of the course did you like least? | What reasons prompted you to choose Bootlin? | How did you first learn about Bootlin? | Interested in other types of embedded Linux engineering services? | Comments and expectations | Comments and suggestions | How do you rate training conditions (room size, equipment, environment)? | How useful were the training labs? | Comments and suggestions | Comments and suggestions | How difficult were the training labs? | Was enough time dedicated to practical labs? | Comments and suggestions | How knowledgeable was the instructor? | Please tell us why you need or don't need paper printed materials | How far do you come from? |
2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 3/29/2019 16:56:21 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 3 | 5 | Labs | ? | Trainer | Presentations in conferences | Not interested | Thank you. | 5 | 3 | 3 | 5 | To take notes, to read on the go, etc. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 3/29/2019 16:58:53 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 4 | Trainer, Open training materials that can be checked in advance, Language, Hardware giveaway (public sessions only), Access to full feedback from participants to previous sessions | Technical resources on the Bootlin website | Linux board support package development, Boot time reduction, Development of real-time systems, Build environment support, Root filesystem development | 5 | 2 | 4 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5 | 3/29/2019 16:58:53 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 5 | Availability for on-site sessions, Language, Hardware giveaway (public sessions only) | Technical resources on the Bootlin website | Build environment support, Technical support, Technology and architecture consulting, On-site engineering | 5 | 2 | 2 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 3/29/2019 17:03:30 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 3 | Details of other interfaces like SPI, USB or PCI topics would be interesting. | 5 | I like the labs and the examples from the actual kernel codes. | I think DMA part should have a lab. It deserves some experiments. | Trainer, Open training materials that can be checked in advance | Technical resources on the Bootlin website | Development of real-time systems | 5 | 3 | 2 | 5 | i managed to take some notes on printed materials. If i've tool to take notes to the slides, that would work. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | 3/29/2019 17:05:10 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | I've already used the material and some slides. The instructor added a lot of information about use cases and how to use the material itself. Also the comments form auditors was useful. | 5 | 4 | 4 | I've scheduled to do labs myself next week. | 3 | 7 | very enthusiastic | 3 | Maybe Yocto | 5 | drivers. | Open training materials that can be checked in advance, I've check the material in advance.Was impressive excellent. | Internet search engines | maybe an on site training on yocto. | I've tryied labs alone in he past. | 5 | 3 | 3 | 5 | Paper material is useful to follow the lecture without losing the focus on important things showed time by time. Maybe 4 slides per page are too much. But it is enough to write down some notes and check them later. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8 | 3/29/2019 17:05:42 | 3 | My objectives were met. It is now on the top of my list of useful trainings for linux kernel development. | 5 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 5 | DMA, Scheduling | 5 | The scheduling and processes part was the most interesting for me. | none all part where good in their way. | Trainer, Open training materials that can be checked in advance, Language, Hardware giveaway (public sessions only), Access to full feedback from participants to previous sessions, Cost | Presentations in conferences | Linux board support package development, Power management, Development of real-time systems, Technology and architecture consulting | 5 | This depends on previous experience with Linux kernel. For me the difficulty was ok. | 3 | 3 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9 | 3/29/2019 17:06:02 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 3 | I2C & UART | Power management | Geographical proximity (public sessions only), Open training materials that can be checked in advance, Language | Web Search | Not interested | Thanks for the Effort, However it was disappointing the time slot for the labs were only 15-20%, more time was expected as mentioned in the training agenda on the website that published it will deliver 50% lecture and 50% lab. | 1 | Very useful if proper time allocated at 50% from the total 5 days. | 3 | 1 | Big disappointment only less than 20%. | 3 |