| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | AA | AB | AC | AD | AE | AF | AG | AH | AI | AJ | AK | AL | AM | AN | AO | AP | AQ | AR | AS | AT | AU | AV | AW | AX | AY | AZ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Timestamp | How did the course meet your learning objectives? | How was the duration of the course? | Comments and suggestions | Comments and suggestions | How useful were the training materials? | Comments and suggestions | Will you recommend this document to others? | Comments and suggestions | If you have Linux / Android project opportunities, will you use this document again in the future? | Comments and suggestions | How important are printed materials? | Comments and suggestions | Did instructor oral explanations add value to the lecture materials? | Comments | How much value did the instructor add to lecture materials? | Suggestions and comments | Was the instructor helpful with practical labs? | Comments and suggestions | How do you rate the training equipment (mainly computers)? | Comments and suggestions | How well was the course organized (program, registration, schedule...)? | Comments and suggestions | How much did you learn? | Comments and suggestions | How useful should this course be in your daily job? | Comments and suggestions | Would you recommend this course to others? | Comments and suggestions | Overall rating | Comments and suggestions | Further training needs? | Comments | How did the course meet your learning objectives? | What part(s) of the course did you like most? | Comments | What part(s) of the course did you like least? | What reasons prompted you to choose Bootlin? | How did you first learn about Bootlin? | Interested in other types of embedded Linux engineering services? | Comments and expectations | Comments and suggestions | How do you rate training conditions (room size, equipment, environment)? | How useful were the training labs? | Comments and suggestions | Comments and suggestions | How difficult were the training labs? | Was enough time dedicated to practical labs? | Comments and suggestions | How knowledgeable was the instructor? | Please tell us why you need or don't need paper printed materials | How far do you come from? |
2 | 6/29/2018 13:13:02 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 4 | The part about building and working with u-boot and the flash file systems ( MTD and UBI/UBIFS) | The RT section | Not applicable - My management made the decision | Internet search engines | Linux board support package development | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 6/29/2018 13:16:18 | 3 | - | 4 | - Instructions in the Lab manuals did mislead at times but the overall labs were pretty well structured | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | Not applicable - My management made the decision | Internet search engines | Linux board support package development, Development of real-time systems | 5 | 3 | 3 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 6/29/2018 13:17:45 | 3 | 4 | At some points the lab documentation coud be a bit more precice. A solutions document would also be an interesting supplement. | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 5 | Not applicable - My management made the decision | Presentations in conferences | Linux board support package development, Boot time reduction, Power management, Development of real-time systems, Build environment support, Root filesystem development, Bug fixing, Technology and architecture consulting | 5 | 3 | 3 | 5 | quick referencing possibilities with self made annotations. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5 | 6/29/2018 13:17:51 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 5 | Driver development | 4 | Building system with kernel and BusyBox and debugging applications. | Creating partitions and moving contents (file systems) | Availability for on-site sessions, Open training materials that can be checked in advance, Access to full feedback from participants to previous sessions | Internet search engines | Boot time reduction, Technical support, Bug fixing | 5 | 3 | 3 | 5 | To add content while attending lecture and writing with pencil, although being old-school, is pretty much faster though. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 6/29/2018 13:21:25 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 3 | I did not understand his jokes!! | 5 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 3 | Access to full feedback from participants to previous sessions, Cost, Not applicable - My management made the decision | Internet search engines | Development of real-time systems, Build environment support, Root filesystem development, Technical support | 5 | 3 | 4 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | 6/29/2018 13:22:17 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | Realtime, Debugging | Not applicable - My management made the decision | Bootlin chosen by my management | Linux board support package development, Boot time reduction, Development of real-time systems, Build environment support, Bug fixing, Technology and architecture consulting | 5 | 3 | 3 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8 | 6/29/2018 13:24:33 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | The scheduled breaks were not always made. Sometimes, mosst of us hurried to get the labs done and therefore found no time to make a break. | 3 | 3 | 4 | More time for the slide presentationand slower speed to be able to follow all the stuff. Better script for the practical lab, to reduce the lab time. Maybe practical lab demonstrations may helpful or to perform it together with the beamer. | 3 | 5 | Open training materials that can be checked in advance, Access to full feedback from participants to previous sessions | Internet search engines | Not interested | 2 | The labs waste much time. The instructions were not always clear. I would prefer to investigate the time in a slower slide presentation. The slides were discussed far too fast. | 4 | 2 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9 | 6/29/2018 13:46:27 | 3 | Actually it was too short for covering everything in the depth I'd like to know it, but on the other hand one week worth of training is exhausting enough ;-) | 5 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 4 | * Realtime-Part * UBoot with UBI * small talk & extra discussions with Maxime | The lab I didn't manage to get running ;-) | Not applicable - My management made the decision | Internet search engines | Not interested | 5 | 2 | 4 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10 | 7/2/2018 11:07:24 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 2 | I'm a hardware developer and wont get much of a chance to use the things I learned, but it will definetly help me to understand how our systems boot and what limitations and possibilites exist. | 6 | The topic of Linux kernel modules was broached but the part of how to leverage this feature didn't come up. I would have appreciatet some more information on this topic, maybe it can even be worked into one of the labs. | 3 | 5 | Information about flash file systems (UBI, UBIFS) and how to set up a base system. | Not applicable - My management made the decision | Bootlin chosen by my management | Technology and architecture consulting | I enjoyed it a lot and appreciated that it covered not only some aspects of setting up a basic Linux system but covered all aspects of booting the system. The labs were a great way to try it out ourselves and took up most of the time, which kept me engaged and focused. | 5 | 3 | 3 | Each group took differently long to complete the labs and it was a bit difficult to see who was done. Maybe something to clip onto the screens to show when one is done or needs help can be helpfull. | 4 | I appreciated that the lab instructions got less precise and more general over the course. |