| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | AA | AB | AC | AD | AE | AF | AG | AH | AI | AJ | AK | AL | AM | AN | AO | AP | AQ | AR | AS | AT | AU | AV | AW | AX | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Timestamp | How did the course meet your learning objectives? | How was the duration of the course? | Comments and suggestions | Comments and suggestions | How useful was the lecture document? | Comments and suggestions | Will you recommend this document to others? | Comments and suggestions | If you have Linux / Android project opportunities, will you use this document again in the future? | Comments and suggestions | How knowledgeable was the instructor? | Comments and suggestions | Did instructor oral explanations add value to the lecture materials? | Comments | How much value did the instructor add to lecture materials? | Suggestions and comments | Was the instructor helpful with practical labs? | Comments and suggestions | How do you rate the training equipment (mainly computers)? | Comments and suggestions | How well was the course organized (program, registration, schedule...)? | Comments and suggestions | How much did you learn? | Comments and suggestions | How useful should this course be in your daily job? | Comments and suggestions | Would you recommend this course to others? | Comments and suggestions | Overall rating | Comments and suggestions | Further training needs? | Comments | How did the course meet your learning objectives? | What part(s) of the course did you like most? | Comments | What part(s) of the course did you like least? | What reasons prompted you to choose Free Electrons? | How did you first learn about Free Electrons? | Interested in other types of embedded Linux engineering services? | Comments and expectations | Comments and suggestions | How do you rate training conditions (room size, equipment, environment)? | How useful were the training labs? | Comments and suggestions | Comments and suggestions | How difficult were the training labs? | Was enough time dedicated to practical labs? | Comments and suggestions | How far do you come from? |
2 | 9/8/2017 11:52:12 | 4 | I expected mor on user-space and much less on kernel compilation. | 3 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | I ued my own computer. | 5 | 3 | 2 | I don't think I'll need to recompile kernel. | 3 | 4 | 2 | debugging | Compiling 7 times kernel | Not applicable - My management made the decision | Free Electrons chosen by my management | Development of real-time systems | 5 | 3 | 5 | 4 | From less than 100 km / 60 miles | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 9/8/2017 12:00:20 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 7 | 3 | yocto and git | 5 | using a build system, example with Buildroot | third party libraries and applications labs | Not applicable - My management made the decision | Free Electrons chosen by my management | Not interested | 5 | 5 | 3 | 4 | From less than 100 km / 60 miles | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 9/8/2017 12:08:28 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 4 | Not applicable - My management made the decision | Free Electrons chosen by my management | Linux board support package development, Power management, Build environment support, Technical support | 5 | 5 | 3 | 3 | From less than 100 km / 60 miles | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5 | 9/8/2017 12:15:51 | 4 | Not a major issue but maybe some labs (flash filesystems, third party libraries) could be a bit shorter while still leading to the right conclusion | From my point of view, the training covers all aspects that you need to build an embedded Linux system | 5 | Learned a lot about Linux systems more generally | 5 | DEFINITELY knowledgeable. Very good teaching skills as well. | 5 | I appreciated the right balance bewteen suggested tools and open-mindedness | 5 | 5 | 3 | Not applicable (I did not organize anything) | 5 | My general understanding of the Linux system (embedded AND desktop) definitely increased. I already knew vaguely about most notions (bootloader, host/target management,...) and tools (U-boot, gdb,...) but everything fits together now. | 5 | 7 | 5 | Thanks of the quality of this training, I think I will dig into the kernel development training by myself | 5 | Bootloader (I love low level :) ) Kernel (I expected to clarify many things and it did) Building blocks (it really helps to understand the system as a whole) | Flash filesystems (because of the difficulty - but interesting) | Not applicable - My management made the decision | Friend | Not interested | Available to all questions - including beyond the lab exercises | 5 | 5 | They really help to understand the goal of each tool | It was the right balance for me - some of them were tough but nothing overly difficult | 5 | 5 | From less than 100 km / 60 miles | ||||||||||||||||
6 | 9/8/2017 12:21:45 | 3 | Duration of courses is well-balanced : short enough not to be too exhausted, long enough to practice a little. | The training course covered a lot of topics on how a Linux system works and how to use cross-compilation tool-chains. It perfectly met our needs though the great number of topics prevented us from digging deeper. | 4 | The lecture documents are useful in helping us to learn about Linux embedded systems. | 5 | The instructor was able to respond to all questions, while giving simple answers to make them understandable. He also has a wide expertise on the subject. | 4 | The instructor held a very lively oral presentation, constantly having a verbal exchange with the audience. | 5 | Room size and environment are peculiar to our company so the rating is only about equipment which was of good quality. | 5 | Again, rating is only about the equipment furnished (boards, wires and adapters), which were of good quality. | 4 | A well-balanced schedule with labs and oral presentation interleaved. | 4 | 5 | This course is of a great help in understanding how a Linux system work : how it starts, compiles, links libraries, install packages and so on. I suppose it is of great added-value in our job as we are using Linux system and are going to use Linux embedded system everyday. | 6 | The missing point is only due to the important amount of slides that prevents the training course from having a perfect rating. | 5 | Didn't take the time to look at the proposed training courses but will definitely think of Free Electrons for further training courses if needed. | 4 | Labs. | Too many consecutive slides sometimes. | Not applicable - My management made the decision | Free Electrons chosen by my management | Technical support | The instructor was fully available to help us get through labs and eventual problems encountered. He always came up with both a solution and an explanation to the problem. | 5 | 5 | There's nothing better than practicing to learn and the labs are well designed. | Labs perfectly balanced, both when starting to learn and when wanting to dig deeper thanks to the "Going further" section. | 3 | 3 | Again, time allocated for practicing was well-balanced. Besides, the instructor dynamically adjusted the time needed to complete each lab. | From less than 100 km / 60 miles | ||||||||||||
7 | 9/8/2017 12:22:15 | 3 | 3 | Maybe slides could be different from the Embedded Linux Training pdf. | 5 | 3 | Maybe he could have done more repetitions of the key informations | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 6 | Once again, I would recommand to change the slide of the presentation because they are too heavy (lots of text). Maybe you could insist more on the possibility for us to interrupt the lesson to ask questions. | 5 | 4 | The theorical explanation of the different blocks which make a embedded system ( boot loader, kernel, rootfs, lib, init file ...) | Everything was interesting and complementary, even the UBI part thanks to the instructor patience. | Not applicable - My management made the decision | Free Electrons chosen by my management | Technical support | He took a lot of time to re explain me the key elements of the lecture document. | 5 | 5 | 3 | 3 | From less than 100 km / 60 miles | |||||||||||||||||||||||
8 | 9/8/2017 12:30:26 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 4 | Geographical proximity (public sessions only), Open training materials that can be checked in advance, Reputation | Course recommended by previous participants | Technical support | 5 | 4 | 3 | 3 | From less than 100 km / 60 miles | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9 | 9/8/2017 12:43:18 | 3 | bonne équilibre théorie / pratique | 3 | ras | 5 | très bon niveau technique, très bon relationnel | 5 | n'ayant pas toute les bases, à su s'adapté et apporter le niveau de support nécessaires | 5 | 2 | target debug port ne fonctionna pas bien, a du nécessité de changer le cordon par un FTDI. Sd card et adaptateur mauvais contact | 5 | 5 | 5 | 7 | féliciation à Boris!!! | 5 | 5 | buildroot debug application file system | third party | Hardware giveaway (public sessions only) | Free Electrons chosen by my management | Power management, Build environment support, Root filesystem development, Technical support, Bug fixing, Technology and architecture consulting | très pertinants | 5 | 5 | ras, très bien | ras | 3 | 3 | bon équilibre training/practical | From less than 100 km / 60 miles | |||||||||||||||||
10 | 9/10/2017 23:50:47 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 5 | Trainer | Internet search engines | Linux board support package development, Build environment support, Root filesystem development | 5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | From less than 100 km / 60 miles |