. | Timestamp | How did the course meet your learning objectives? | How was the duration of the course? | Comments and suggestions | Comments and suggestions | How useful was the lecture document? | Comments and suggestions | Will you recommend this document to others? | Comments and suggestions | If you have Linux / Android project opportunities, will you use this document again in the future? | Comments and suggestions | How knowledgeable was the instructor? | Comments and suggestions | Did instructor oral explanations add value to the lecture materials? | Comments | How much value did the instructor add to lecture materials? | Suggestions and comments | Was the instructor helpful with practical labs? | Comments and suggestions | How do you rate the training equipment (mainly computers)? | Comments and suggestions | How well was the course organized (program, registration, schedule...)? | Comments and suggestions | How much did you learn? | Comments and suggestions | How useful should this course be in your daily job? | Comments and suggestions | Would you recommend this course to others? | Comments and suggestions | Overall rating | Comments and suggestions | An extra session? | Comments | How did the course meet your learning objectives? | What part(s) of the course did you like most? | Comments | What part(s) of the course did you like least? | What prompted you to choose Free Electrons? | How did you first learn about Free Electrons? | Interested in other types of embedded Linux / Android engineering services? | Comments and expectations | Comments and suggestions | How do you rate training conditions (room size, equipment, environment)? | How useful were the training labs? | Comments and suggestions | Comments and suggestions | How difficult were the training labs? | Was enough time dedicated to practical labs? | Comments and suggestions | How far do you come from? |
. | 7/11/2014 14:55:12 | 3 | More detailed description of labs to be more efficient. | 4 | Labs description a little mor detailed. | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 4 | Bootloaders and debugging | Libraries. | Availability for on-site sessions | Technical resources on the Free Electrons website | Board Support Package development: make Linux / Android support your new hardware | 5 | 5 | 4 | 3 | From less than 100 km / 60 miles | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
. | 7/11/2014 14:58:02 | 2 | It is a 10 days course, but it would be quite dificult to obtain such "free" time to assist. | Course was very interesting. In order to obtain a first big picture of embedded linux is very useful, but too dense to finish it in 5 days. | 4 | In my opinion it is neccesary to add step to step labs'solutions. | 5 | He is an real expert. It was a pleasure to lisen him. | 3 | Perhaps my level wasn enought, but a slower labs completition, or explanation, or command history trace, or something similar would be very useful. | 4 | 3 | 5 | 5 | It was a very complete first-steep to abtain a selft learning guide for the future. | 5 | 7 | 5 | System building for different platforms, in order to see and understand so diferent options for each systemś part. | 4 | Labs | Some lectures. | Geographical proximity (public sessions only), Open training materials that can be checked in advance, Silica email | Technical resources on the Free Electrons website | Not interested | He was OK. | 4 | 4 | It would be completed witha step by step solution guide.... | Just the expected level. | 4 | 3 | From less than 100 km / 60 miles | |||||||||||||||||
. | 7/11/2014 15:04:33 | 3 | Duration is ok, but contents should be more dense | I think there were people with very different levels in the audience, coming from very different backgrounds. This forced the instructor to be very thoroughly on basic topics, and prevented the more advanced topics to be fully and thoroughly covered | 5 | Documentation is very good | 5 | Absolutely no complaint, Marcin is a very good instructor! | 5 | Marcin tends to explain a lot of additional stuff, related to the topic at hand (which is something I like very much!), but I think he should make it clearer which parts are the "must hear" most important topics, and which is accessory stuff. Some of my colleagues were lost in the details, and missed the important stuff mentioned in between. | 5 | Wifi was a bit spotty at times, and login had to be entered multiple times.. | 5 | The IGEP board seems a nice platform for this training, and it gives the feeling that you're working on a real-world example, not some "ideal" emulator | 5 | No complaints. | 3 | I've been a Linux sysadmin for some time now. I came here for embedded-specific stuff, but we spent a lot of time in generic linux topics. | 4 | 5 | We should somehow ensure that all attendees come from similar backgrounds and are knowledgeable in similar stuff | 2 | 2 | Bootloaders, nand filesystems | Trainer, Open training materials that can be checked in advance | Presentations in conferences | Technical support, Consulting in technology selection and methodology | Maybe consulting sessions, make sure none of the steps we are taking is clearly wrong or there is a better option for our needs. Have someone to call when stuck on a problem. | He's one of those people who immediately sees the solution just by seeing a vague error message. Very helpful! | 4 | 4 | I think the course lingers too much on "general linux" stuff and not enough on "embedded-specific" topics. I already know how to compile a kernel for my computer, show me what's different on an embedded platform! | 2 | 3 | From more than 100 km / 60 miles, same country | |||||||||||||||
. | 7/11/2014 15:25:24 | 3 | It was appropriate to cover all the course subjects | Course did meet my requirement, specially the u-boot and the nand part Yet I was more interesting in kernel modules but I know that it is covered in a separate course | 3 | Some commands in the labs were intentionally missing and it was typed by the instructor I understand that this is useful so that the attendee can perform some trial and error first Yet the labs document are not self contained and trying to re-implement the same lab after the course, I risk to get stuck ( I had to write the commands by hand on the pages, yet I missed some ) | 5 | He is very knowledgeable and upon asking him he didn't just answer my question he always elaborated more ( from his own experience ) which was great | 5 | I did read the lab materials before the training, yet everything became much clearer due to his help | 5 | 5 | We came with our own laptops at day one the serial cables weren't compatible | 4 | 3 | To be honest the kernel compiling and debugging was a previous acquired knowledge | 4 | 6 | Although that the course went pretty well I was very hard to be working in groups of 2, since everyone had his own personal board We were told that this was to limit the number of attendee to help, but we just shared the equipment and each one implemented on his own board in turn Personally I believe each one should work on his own, and whoever finishes first can help the rest | 5 | 4 | Not applicable - My management made the decision | Internet search engines | Board Support Package development: make Linux / Android support your new hardware | He was always available and helped with any blocking problems | 5 | 5 | They are excellent, yet we can use more of them | 3 | 3 | From a foreign country | |||||||||||||||||||
. | 7/11/2014 15:57:04 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 5 | Debuging tools more in deep. | 5 | All of them but specially: - File systems - Build root - Program debugging: Eclipse + gdb + gdbserver | None | Trainer, Open training materials that can be checked in advance | Technical resources on the Free Electrons website | Power management, Build environment deployment and support, Root filesystem design and development | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | From more than 100 km / 60 miles, same country |