
.	Timestamp	How did the course meet your learning objectives?	How was the duration of the course?	Comments and suggestions	Comments and suggestions	How helpful were the lecture materials?	Comments and suggestions	Will you recommend these materials to others?	Comments and suggestions	If you have Linux project opportunities, will you use these materials again in the future?	Comments and suggestions	How knowledgeable was the instructor?	Comments and suggestions	Did instructor oral explanations add value to the lecture materials?	Comments	How well did the instructor answer questions from the audience?	Suggestions and comments	Was the instructor helpful with practical labs?	Comments and suggestions	How useful were the training labs?	Comments and suggestions	How difficult were the training labs?	Comments and suggestions	Was enough time dedicated to practical labs?	Comments and suggestions	How do you rate training conditions (room size, equipment, environment)?	Comments and suggestions	How do you rate the training equipment (mainly computers)?	Comments and suggestions	How well was the course organized (program, registration, schedule...)?	Comments and suggestions	How much did you learn?	Comments and suggestions	How useful should this course be in your daily job?	Comments and suggestions	Would you recommend this course to others?	Comments and suggestions	Overall rating	Comments and suggestions	An extra session?	Comments	How did the course meet your learning objectives?	What part(s) of the course did you like most?	Comments	What part(s) of the course did you like least?	What prompted you to choose Free Electrons?	How did you first learn about Free Electrons?	Interested in other types of embedded Linux engineering services?	Comments and expectations
.	10/10/2011 13:46:09		2			4		4		4		4		4		4		5		4		3		2		3		4		3		4		3		4	Start with the big picture first ! Then give the details during the labs.	5		3	No	4	The big picture part		The Beginning could have been shorten up	Geographical proximity (public sessions only)	Course recommended by previous participants	On-site development, support and consulting services
.	10/10/2011 14:07:40		2	This isn't a bad grade. What I am trying to tell you, is that there was so much interesting subjects to touch and study, but unfortunately there wasn't time to cover everything.		5	The lecture materials were perfect. I love how every assignments is writing in a way that you can't really just start doing them. I had really to think first or even look things up in lxr or cscope. That was a very pleasant surprise. The presentation slides are not only helpful during the training, but even now I find myself recommending it to other people. I am still using them to learn more and as reference when I need to look up something.	5	Keep up the good work. It is really much appreciated.	5	I don't see any reason why I should not.	5	For me it was surprising how much the instructor was knowledgeable! This was definitely the best part of the training.	5	Sometimes I had the feeling that some subjects were explained a bit more then needed. However I did notice that this feeling was not shared by the others. So I guess this might be because of different backgrounds of other participators.	5	That was another this which was really surprising. Michael was not afraid to say that he was not sure about certain answers, but he would always explains it the next day. Really great quality.	5		5	Nothing to add here.	3	I think the training labs were well balanced.	2	I would loved to do more practical labs.	4	Room size: That was really small. Lunches: Very good. Equipment: Well prepared. Even had spare keyboards for qwerty users. Environment: Nothing to complain, nice city & very nice weather. Not to far from cheap airport.	5	Really nothing to complain about.	5	Also nothing to complain about.	5	I learned a lot, which was the goal anyway.	3	For my daily jobs not that much yet. I don't use an operation system for my current project yet. For my free time, well I will start to at least contribute every month once.	5	Already did.	7		5	More on porting. Also writing a driver, like a simple led driver or something added to the development board.	5	PCI driver walk through. Git usage include creating a kernel batch and submitting it.		Can not think of something yet.	Trainer, Open training materials that can be checked in advance, Hardware giveaway (public sessions only), Access to full feedback from participants to previous sessions	Technical resources on the Free Electrons website	Not interested
.	10/10/2011 15:03:49		1	The duration of the course ist basically OK, but unfortunatly 5 days are not enaugh to perfome the all courses material. Some part of the course can be left. The course should be more focused on embedded system.	No comments	5	Issues have to be focued on embedded system.	5		5		5		5		4		5		5		2		3		4		5		5		5		5		5		6		5	Android, but not now.	5	The labs ...!		Pci driver develpment.	Trainer, Open training materials that can be checked in advance, Language, Hardware giveaway (public sessions only), Access to full feedback from participants to previous sessions	Internet search engines	Boot time reduction, Power management, Build environment deployment and support, Investigating and fixing bugs, On-site development, support and consulting services	The course material (slides) have to be improved. The course have to be focused on embedded system only. Mush more fokus on labs. The order and the art to introduce linux driver development have also to be improve, e.g. (framework, plattform, and conventional one) and introduce early in the training.
.	10/13/2011 11:27:19		3			5		5		5		5		5		4		5		5		3		3		5		5		4		4		5		5		6		3	Embedded Linux training	4	all!		N/A	Trainer, Open training materials that can be checked in advance, Hardware giveaway (public sessions only)	Course recommended by previous participants	Real-time: implementation and bug fixing, Consulting in technology selection and methodology