| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
. | Timestamp | How did the course meet your learning objectives? | How was the duration of the course? | Comments and suggestions | Comments and suggestions | How helpful were the lecture materials? | Comments and suggestions | Will you recommend these materials to others? | Comments and suggestions | If you have Linux project opportunities, will you use these materials again in the future? | Comments and suggestions | How knowledgeable was the instructor? | Comments and suggestions | Did instructor oral explanations add value to the lecture materials? | Comments | How well did the instructor answer questions from the audience? | Suggestions and comments | Was the instructor helpful with practical labs? | Comments and suggestions | How useful were the training labs? | Comments and suggestions | How difficult were the training labs? | Comments and suggestions | Was enough time dedicated to practical labs? | Comments and suggestions | How do you rate training conditions (room size, equipment, environment)? | Comments and suggestions | How do you rate the training equipment (mainly computers)? | Comments and suggestions | How well was the course organized (program, registration, schedule...)? | Comments and suggestions | How much did you learn? | Comments and suggestions | How useful should this course be in your daily job? | Comments and suggestions | Would you recommend this course to others? | Comments and suggestions | Overall rating | Comments and suggestions | An extra session? | Comments | How did the course meet your learning objectives? |
. | 1/7/2011 18:05:42 | | 5 | Great! | It was really helpful to understand and investigate into Kernel linux and driver development.
The
implementation of an example driver is a great idea but It would be
interesting to give data sheet about the device/communication. Perhaps,
serial communication is obvious for many of your students. | 5 | I
like the evolution of level of details in labs: the first lab is really
explained step by step while explications for the last one are small. | 5 | | 5 | | 5 | even when he does not know something. At least, he knows where we can found informations. | 5 | | 5 | | 5 | | 5 | | 4 | they were a little bit too easy but make them harder will probably make them too long too. | 1 | | 3 | A little bit noisy, ceiling light were not appropriate. (but It is not your fault) | 5 | | 5 | The on-the-fly modifications were really appreciable. | 3 | As expected! | 4 | It should be useful, wait and see! | 5 | I saved many years of auto-learning with this formation. | 6 | | 3 | Yes but I have a lot to do. | 4 |
. | 1/10/2011 9:59:52 | | 3 | | | 4 | | 4 | | 4 | | 5 | | 4 | | 4 | | 5 | | 4 | | 4 | | 4 | | 4 | | 5 | | 5 | | 4 | | 4 | | 4 | | 6 | | 5 | | 4 |
. | 1/10/2011 10:36:33 | | 3 | | | 5 | | 5 | | 5 | the documents are already helpful for home practicing on SAM9G45 | 5 | | 5 | | 5 | | 5 | | 5 | a very good point on this formation is the presence of the practical labs between each lectures.
the rhythm is dynamic and we keep our attention on the subject most of the time | 3 | the level is high and the prerequisites must be worked before the training, but all of this is bearable. | 3 | | 4 | the training conditions were more of valeo responsability.
the materials furnished by free electron for the labs (CALAO) were good and easy to manipulate. | 4 | training computers were valeo or personal ones, this is more of valeo responsibility | 4 | | 5 | very complete training | 3 | this
training is not really related to my daily jobs for the moment, i did
it to be able to switch to embedded linux projects soon | 5 | | 7 | | 5 | i would be interested in IPC, SMP, network distributed applications for embedded targets (arm cortex A9, blackfin, tricore) | 5 |
. | 1/13/2011 13:53:19 | | 3 | | | 4 | | 5 | | 4 | | 4 | | 4 | | 4 | | 5 | | 5 | | 3 | | 3 | | 4 | | 3 | | 4 | | 4 | | 5 | | 5 | | 7 | | 1 | | 5 |